Minolta Rangefinder Meet & Greet

Time passes quickly, as it was a little more than two years ago when I wrote a post (Minolta Love—Enjoying My Toys!) describing my impression of all the cameras I had at the time. Should you read that post, you will find that I had only two non-SLR cameras—a 7sII rangefinder and a Freedom Zoom 160 point-and-shoot. I had avoided rangefinders because of an unimpressive week spent with my father-in-law’s Leica (M3, I think). Compared to an SLR, rangefinders struck me as being more trouble than they were worth.

Street photography seemed to be the forte of rangefinders, à la Cartier-Bresson. I had no interest in street photography (at least not shots of people), so I saw no advantage in using a rangefinder over an SLR. Since studio still-life photography is one of my main goals, rangefinders offer no advantage over SLRs or even TLRs. I wish I could say a moment of photographic inspiration led me to rangefinders. But, no, I simply desired to explore more of Minolta’s past. My curiosity took me back before 1958, when the Minolta’s first SLR, the SR-2, arrived.  

Curiosity alone would not have been sufficient for me to try other rangefinders had not the 7sII proven to be such an excellent camera. It didn’t hurt that it weighed less than a pound. After two rolls of film, I can say the lens is wonderful—sharp with good color rendition. I used it in auto and manual modes, and even without the meter in manual mode, I still liked using it. The 7sII removed my ambivalence toward rangefinders and was enough to make me seek out more.  

The Minolta A, a simple camera released in 1955 for casual users, came next. Few show up for sale, but luckily, this one popped up for about 25.00. It has a top shutter speed of 1/300 and a maximum aperture of f3.5. On a bright July day, I took it on a walk loaded with 100 ISO color film. After a few shots, I set the aperture at f11 and the shutter at 1/300 and fired away. According to the camera’s distance scale, everything beyond 15 feet was in focus, so no more stopping to focus! The Minolta A is also lighter than nearly every SLR I own, so it became a viable option when I’m out and want shots of the city. Anytime an SLR with a 50mm lens will do, a rangefinder will work just as well, so rangefinders offer another option. From the Minolta A, G.A.S took over.  

Finding working rangefinders from the 1950s takes some effort. On average, a working model in very good condition shows up about every four months for “A” series cameras (A, A-2, Super A, A5, AL). The A3 rarely shows up (I’ve seen only one for sale in the last five years). The V2 and V3 are rare birds in the US—I’ve only seen two V2s and one V3 for sale in the US since 2019. The Minolta-35, Minolta’s Leica-influenced rangefinder, suffers from shutter curtain issues, so while they show up for sale, few working models do. The 7s and 7sII are plentiful. What has surprised me most about all of these cameras is how sharp the lenses are. If you can find one in good working order, try it. And now, my current rangefinder corps.

Minolta-35
The Minolta-35 was introduced in 1947 and sold until 1959 (Leica mount).  The last three models are pictured here: Model F, Model II, and Model IIB. Only the IIB shutter works reliably. Aside from curtain issues, the camera is solid. The top speed is 1/500 sec. I like it. Finding a working model is a quest. 

Minolta A
Released in 1955, it is a simple camera with a decent-sized viewfinder. The slow speeds on these tend to be a problem. Top speed is 1/300 sec. It fits in a pocket, so pop in some 100 ISO film on a sunny day, set it at f11 and 1/300, and go. Color film can handle a few stops of overexposure, so no worries and no focusing. 

Minolta A-2 
There are two versions—f3.5 (1955) and f2.8 (1957). Both versions of the A-2 have a top speed of 1/500 sec and parallax correction. It’s a faster Minolta A and is harder to find. 

Minolta Super A
The Super A is an interchangeable lens rangefinder with a bayonet mount brought to market in 1957. Five lenses were introduced with it: 35mm f3.5, 50mm f2, 50mm f1.8, 50mm f2.8, 85mm f2.8, 100mm f3.8, 135mm f4.5. The 50mm lenses are common, especially the f2; the others are hard to find and expensive. Top speed is 1/400. A meter was available for it. (My meter works and is accurate!) The 50mm f2 lens is much better than expected, but my copy does flare easily. This is a more serious camera. It handles more like the Minolta-35 than the others in the A-line. I wish Minolta had developed it further.

Minolta A5
The A5 maintains the design of the earlier A3, and it was introduced in 1960. It has a 45mm f2.8 lens and a top speed of 1/1000 sec. As expected, the lens is sharp. It is a serviceable rangefinder that yields good results. It doesn’t inspire any love, but I appreciate the faster shutter.  

Minolta V2 & V3
The V2 (1958) and V3 (1960) seem to have been experiments. They do not follow the A series design and have much faster top shutter speeds. The V2 has a top speed of 1/2000 sec while the Minolta V3 blazes at 1/3000 sec. Both have 45mm lenses, but the V2 is an f2 while the V3 is an f1.8. Both lenses are very sharp with great color. The V3 has a built-in meter, and the meter on my V3 works fine. I like the roundish designs of these cameras; they have an art deco-ish feel. They also seem to fit my hands better—love them. 

Minolta Hi-Matic 7s
The Minolta 7s is part of the Hi-Matic line, the next group of Minolta rangefinders. I have to admit, I never intended to buy a 7s, but a seller offered this one—in a box—for burger and fries money. Who was I to say no? Released in 1966, the 7s has a built-in meter and sharp 45mm f1.8 lens—the top speed is 1/500 sec. The meter on my copy has proven to be very accurate, a pleasant surprise. The exposure value system took some time to get used to, but otherwise, I have no complaints. It’s a bit chunky but gives excellent results—a definite keeper.

Minolta Hi-Matic 7sII
In 1977, Minolta brought its true rangefinder line to an end. There were Hi-Matic cameras after 1977, but they were simpler devices. The 7sII is a great little camera with a 40mm f1.7 lens and a top shutter speed of 1/500, offering shutter-priority automatic exposure and an unmetered manual mode. The lens is tack-sharp with good contrast. Its weight is what I like most. The 7sII weighs slightly more than 16oz (460g) (aside from the A and A-2, the others are hefty). It is also small enough to fit into a coat pocket, making it ideal for travel or general photography. Love it!

Well, that’s the gang. Perhaps a Minolta AL (first A series rangefinder with a built-in meter) will join the group at some point, but I have plenty to keep me busy for now. Each camera will receive a post on ESF. Stay tuned…

10 Comments

  1. Interesting article…my film gear is all Minolta SLR. My brother has a couple of rangefinders, a technology that I never used yet nevertheless regarded as obsolete. (compared to TTL SLR. I was shocked to learn that Leica is still making rangefinder cameras.) The rangefinder investigation ensued. I decided that the CLE is the one…right now it is being tuned in CA by a former Minolta technician. This fine condition kit came with the Rokkor 40/2, and 90/4, Minolta rubber hoods, the CLE flash, the leather CLE case…Even though the CLE is in the shop, I bought the 28/2 Ultron type II. (I really wanted the Rokkor 28/2.8 but the spotting defect is a deal breaker)…and the Minolta CLE grip (the CLE is very small). I am looking forward to actually taking pictures with it…Have you used the CLE? How does it compare the ones in the article.? I also live in Atlanta in case you have not used a CLE…I told the FedEx driver what he delivered…incredibly he knew what the CLE was. (he has film cameras), so I opened the box while he was at the house. That was fun.

    1. Author

      I see you have been on an interesting journey. Though I have read a lot about the CLE, I have never tried one. I am in the early stages of rangefinder use, and I’m still exploring their potential. But my goal, for now, is continuing to explore Minolta’s past through its cameras. I have a few folding cameras and I’m learning how to use them to the best effect. When my expiring days are past, I plan to sell off most of my collection and keep a few favorites. That is likely when I would invest in a CLE.

      1. Hi Again! The CLE is back in the house! Attached the grip, the 40mm f2 and let the range finding begin. It-Is-So-Weird (compared to the TTL SLR.) I really like the Minolta SLR micro prism/split prism focusing screen AND the TTL lens magnification. Bright, clear, easy. The CLE rangefinder split prism is…well… it is going to take some getting used to. Still getting used to the concept that you can take photos with the lens cap on 🙁 My brother advises to keep both eyes open when focusing…but the left eye sees a larger image, so that is weird. (Maybe keep the left eye slightly open?) I read several, well thought out CLE reviews by famous photographers…one stating that the CLE was the best 35mm camera he ever used. One made a compelling case for its IQ and ease of use. Clearly… I have got to start shooting the CLE 😉 I will follow up after I have shot a few rolls of film. I am both skeptical AND optimistic that I will discover the magic of the CLE 🙂 Shifting gears…I have one digital camera and lens. Sony a7iv and the 24-70 GM2. Also have the Novoflex MD/SR to Sony E mount adaptor. The plan was to curate a decent collection of Rokkor glass (plus the Tokina AT-X Macro 90mm f 2.5 …I was kind of obsessive there for a while 😉 Anyway, I really like using the vintage glass on the Sony. (Bonus: I have learned how to semi-competently clean Rokkor glass, which is kind of gratifying). I bought the Sony about 11 months ago. Rushed through some setting change tutorials and took it to Japan (along with an XE-7, X-700, 4 lenses…and a Benro tripod. I know!! too much gear for 2 weeks in Japan! But I used it all. Took over 1K photos on the Sony and shot 7 rolls of film 🙂 Later, 2 weeks Norway in October. Fun! Currently, the past 2 weeks I have been studying tutorials on the Sony. Set ups, button customization. Learning what this camera is capable of and how to do it. I am looking forward to becoming semi-proficient.
        ha ha ha. PS: I couldn’t resist, acquired the Fotodiox Tilt/Shift MD-Sony E Mount adaptor. More fun with the Rokkor glass on the Sony It is still in the box, but its time is coming 🙂 PPS: re: exploring Minolta’s past. My first 35mm SLR was a Minolta XGA. (1981?) Took many, many good photos. Took it everywhere. Then technology happened. Sony Cybershot. then iPhone…. I wanted to return to film and bought CLA’d /mint SRT202 in 2023…Here I am today.

        1. Author

          Sounds like you have a full menu of things to do! The more I use rangefinders, the more they grow on me. Right now, the 7sII is my favorite RF. It’s on the small side like the CLE. The biggest change for me was getting into the mindset for a specific focal length and not using zoom lenses. Have fun!

  2. Nice collection, Jerome! After selling the Hi-Matic 7s last year, I have no Minolta rangefinders, just SLRs. And right now I don’t have any burning need, as I have a Canonet QL17 GIII (overrated, yes, but is still a great camera) and a Yashica YF (a rare LTM).

    I was in pursuit of a Minoltina S (or Minolta AL-S) as it checked off the boxes: Minolta, smaller than a Hi-Matic 7s, light meter, full manual exposure control. Alas, they are not that common, and the two that passed through my hands had shutter issues. I might have tried to fix one if the working Canonet did not land in my lap.

    I do have one question/correction: “. It has a top shutter speed of 1/200 and a maximum aperture of f3.5…I set the aperture at f11 and the shutter at 1/300 and fired away.” Well, which is it? 1/200 or 1/300? Or do you have the Magic Minolta Touch and can increase the top speed on cameras? 😉

    1. Author

      Yes, my collection has grown. I’m trying to get into the rangefinder mindset set.

      The 1/200 was a typo. It was the 1/300 I shot with in July. All the best though because the first model is toast. Maybe one day I’ll take it apart (I found a tutorial), but not worth having repaired.

      1. Ah, come on, Jerome, just admit: You have the Magic Minolta Manipulation!

        Anyways, hopefully you’ll get your hands on a Minoltina S so I’ll learn what I’m missing.

        1. Author

          Stop that. I have too many cameras as it is.

          1. So then give some cameras away to make room! Preferably to me. 😉

          2. Author

            One day, maybe.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *